HALL v. TWITTER
What a total clown show this case has been. The Judicially Noticed evidence without doubt proves that the court and it's judges had a bias in favor of Twitter by allowing non-member Twitter attorneys to practice before the court 91 times. Not only did the court not uphold Hall's original rights against Twitter, but continued the assault against Hall's rights by not providing due process of an unbiased tribunal and equal protection of the law.
Verogna v. JOHNSTONE
This case saw Chief Judge McCafferty disregarding precedents, laws and rules of the court. Check out her many lies and misrepresentations made in an effort to conceal Magistrate Johnstone's illegal policy which favored Twitter, which was effectively her policy because she was Chief Judge making her responsible for these illegal policies. See Rule 59 Motion to Reconsider.